PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 25.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 85.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star PS63 Modern 8RD |
Motherboard | MSI MS-16S1 (all builds) |
Memory | 4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20181224 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Jan 11 '21 at 13:15 |
Run Duration | 115 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
|
46.4%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
MSI(1462 126C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6109
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.5%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1032 512GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20140000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 567 260 253 238 218 216 MB/s
|
85.9%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
40.2%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
GPU | |
---|---|
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples | 97x |
GeForce GTX 1050 With Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 22%, 347 samples | 24x |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 26%, 1,098 samples | 22x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |