Asus M4A785TD-V EVO

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	52.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus M4A785TD-V EVO (all builds)
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100723
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 10 '21 at 13:19
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340 12,769 User benchmarks, average bench 59% AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Memory 93.4 1-Core 53.1 2-Core 102 55% 82.8 Pts	4-Core 195 8-Core 290 30% 242 Pts	64-Core 291 18% 291 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(174B 2438) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (66 fps cap detected)	52.6% Above average	Lighting 64.8 Reflection 66.3 Parallax 60.2 53% 63.8 fps	MRender 66.2 Gravity 65.4 Splatting 60.9 52% 64.2 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38 83,298 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 102GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 98 99 100 101 58 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.3% Poor	Read 229 Write 199 Mixed 8 SusWrite 78.4 28% 129 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.3 39% 9.53 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 92%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$24 89,637 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 246GB free Firmware: SS16 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 99 100 101 101 58 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	54% Above average	Read 109 Write 106 Mixed 54.8 SusWrite 79.3 64% 87.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	35% Below average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 12.7 33% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 9.9 23% 8.1 GB/s	Latency 61.2 65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A785TD-V EVO Builds (Compare 176 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A785TD-V EVO

CPU
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	37x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	22x
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	17x

GPU
Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples	18x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	12x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	11x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	5x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	4x

RAM
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	29x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	28x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $172

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16