PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 3.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 56.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Apple MacBookPro9,2 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Apple Mac-6F01561E16C75D06 |
Memory | 1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20180409 |
Uptime | 2.7 Days |
Run Date | Jan 10 '21 at 07:55 |
Run Duration | 180 Seconds |
Run User | CHL-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
55.2%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Apple(106B 00FA) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4885
|
3.11%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 217 186 54 45 41 MB/s
|
56.8%
Above average
|
|||
Generic External 1TB
118GB free, PID 0840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 12 12 11 11 13 MB/s
|
9.59%
Terrible
|
|||
Generic External 500GB
138GB free, PID 0840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 12 12 11 11 11 MB/s
|
6.84%
Terrible
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
27GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 12 11 11 11 MB/s
|
19%
Very poor
|
|||
Samsung S2 Portable 640GB
5GB free, PID 1f06
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
|
54.6%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples | 375x |
Core i7-3520MIntelBench 53%, 19,660 samples | 81x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples | 455x |
RTX 4070-TiNvidia $651Bench 240%, 46,082 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 46% - Average | Total price: $132 |