MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	45% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Micro-Star MS-7C09
Motherboard	MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09) (all builds)
Memory	3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200106
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jan 10 '21 at 05:31
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	90.9% Outstanding	Memory 91.1 1-Core 126 2-Core 252 88% 156 Pts	4-Core 490 8-Core 693 74% 591 Pts	64-Core 724 45% 724 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 90.9% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 22,284 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Nvidia(10DE 145C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45% Average	Lighting 55.3 Reflection 59.2 Parallax 50.8 45% 55.1 fps	MRender 63.7 Gravity 50.6 Splatting 51.6 45% 55.3 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
3 128GB SSD 128GB 1,066 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1127B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 24 23 23 14 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	41.4% Average	Read 428 Write 45.3 Mixed 84.8 SusWrite 21.7 31% 145 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 16.1 4K Mixed 20.5 66% 19 MB/s	DQ Read 64.3 DQ Write 42.9 DQ Mixed 1.4 15% 36.2 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 168GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 126 133 134 135 134 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	Read 122 Write 125 Mixed 76.7 SusWrite 132 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TYA4U2666D19081C 1x8GB 345 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	43.3% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 12 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 11.5 SC Mixed 11.8 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 65.5 61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09) Builds (Compare 6,340 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	2,311x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	1,500x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	291x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	635x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	462x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	356x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	454x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	282x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	206x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	203x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	164x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples	155x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $359

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16