Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive92.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 09 '21 at 19:03
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 86.1
1-Core 78.1
2-Core 149
63% 104 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 439
41% 340 Pts
64-Core 454
28% 454 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Device(4D50 4449) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
130% Outstanding
Lighting 182
Reflection 169
Parallax 160
148% 170 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 137
Splatting 117
117% 147 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 130%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 207 198 157 189 182 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 381
Mixed 368
SusWrite 198
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 75.1
4K Mixed 49.7
160% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 263
197% 263 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
811GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 149 146 149 149 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 150
Write 149
Mixed 102
SusWrite 148
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
196% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 109%
Toshiba MK5055GSX 500GB-$33
318GB free
Firmware: FG001M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 66 66 65 64 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 61
Write 61
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 64.9
41% 55.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BA160B.C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.8% Average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 13.8
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback