Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	8.68% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	56.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 970 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131111
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 09 '21 at 17:04
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	52%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$47 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	53% Above average	Memory 75.6 1-Core 52.7 2-Core 97.1 48% 75.1 Pts	4-Core 166 8-Core 268 27% 217 Pts	64-Core 272 17% 272 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Gigabyte(1458 363C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	8.68% Terrible	Lighting 9.7 Reflection 12.7 Parallax 12.5 8% 11.6 fps	MRender 14.2 Gravity 12.5 Splatting 11.2 10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.68% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 151GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41100RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 189 182 191 177 177 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	Read 340 Write 354 Mixed 224 SusWrite 183 62% 275 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 42.3 4K Mixed 28 93% 31 MB/s	DQ Read 30.5 DQ Write 78.3 DQ Mixed 41.2 35% 50 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 101%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 815GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 68 69 68 68 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	76.2% Very good	Read 197 Write 156 Mixed 104 SusWrite 68.2 97% 131 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 230% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 109%
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29 14,402 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 207GB free Firmware: VT100-41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 68 69 68 68 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	37.6% Below average	Read 62.7 Write 68 Mixed 44.1 SusWrite 68.2 45% 60.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown GY1600D364L10/8G 1x8GB 1,033 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.1% Poor	MC Read 9.1 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 8.2 25% 8.73 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 6.4 19% 6.5 GB/s	Latency 89.1 45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	127x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	73x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	31x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	24x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	21x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	15x
850 Evo 120GBSamsung $80Bench 96%, 69,224 samples	13x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	12x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	9x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $396

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16