Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	24.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	22.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4300-$73 55,454 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	45.6% Average	Memory 70.3 1-Core 34.4 2-Core 93.2 42% 66 Pts	4-Core 126 8-Core 111 16% 119 Pts	64-Core 111 7% 111 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	24.6% Poor	Lighting 31.2 Reflection 36.9 Parallax 39.8 25% 36 fps	MRender 33.7 Gravity 30.5 Splatting 22.9 23% 29 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 256G 256GB 150 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: 40101000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 86 73 70 71 71 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	22.8% Poor	Read 167 Write 48 Mixed 82.2 SusWrite 74.2 20% 92.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 8.6 4K Mixed 9.6 21% 6.9 MB/s	DQ Read 94.4 DQ Write 114 DQ Mixed 49.8 53% 86.2 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 108%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB 1,393 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 29GB free, PID 4200 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 16 16 16 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	8.3% Terrible	Read 20.5 Write 10.7 Mixed 8.5 SusWrite 16.3 18% 14 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 39% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 8.3% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	MC Read 10.9 MC Write 9.1 MC Mixed 10.4 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 7.9 17% 5.9 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16