Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics45.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150323
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 28 '17 at 09:48
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8370-$175
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 86.7
1-Core 75.5
2-Core 152
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 441
43% 355 Pts
64-Core 442
27% 442 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
Asus(1043 04FD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.5.2
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.7% Average
Lighting 55.1
Reflection 64.5
Parallax 70.3
45% 63.3 fps
MRender 66.5
Gravity 54.3
Splatting 54.2
47% 58.3 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
53GB free
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 457
Write 182
Mixed 219
63% 286 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 27.3
4K Mixed 9.86
56% 18.7 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 91.5
DQ Mixed 19.7
45% 96.7 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
2TB free
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 160
Mixed 156
124% 165 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.22
80% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$32
884GB free
Firmware: CC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 177
Mixed 165
131% 174 MB/s
4K Read 0.93
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.34
106% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 2400 C11 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.3% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 11.7
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z Builds (Compare 898 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $630
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback