Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130205
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateJan 08 '21 at 12:30
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 85.3
1-Core 73.2
2-Core 128
60% 95.5 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 425
40% 333 Pts
64-Core 414
26% 414 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.2% Above average
Lighting 69.3
Reflection 74.4
Parallax 68.2
56% 70.6 fps
MRender 66.3
Gravity 70.3
Splatting 67.7
56% 68.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$129
685GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 350 396 358 370 367 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 452
Write 419
Mixed 406
SusWrite 353
92% 407 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 75.8
4K Mixed 46.7
152% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 79.4
107% 195 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 133%
Toshiba Q300 240GB-$85
46GB free
Firmware: SAFM12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 121 118 143 143 144 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 372
Write 354
Mixed 196
SusWrite 133
59% 264 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 19.5
75% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 21.8
DQ Write 81.8
DQ Mixed 22.1
26% 41.9 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 93%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
314GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 299 284 285 252 301 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 402
Mixed 409
SusWrite 278
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 73.6
4K Mixed 47.6
155% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 245
DQ Mixed 29
86% 186 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 129%
Toshiba DT01ABA200 2TB
861GB free
Firmware: MZ4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 121 118 143 143 144 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 70.2
Write 65.8
Mixed 20
SusWrite 133
52% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 85%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
587GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 65 63 65 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 55.5
Write 45.5
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 63.4
39% 53.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.3% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 15.2
44% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 13.1
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990FXA-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,400 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $440
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback