PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 98.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 (all builds) |
Memory | 9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130205 |
Uptime | 2.7 Days |
Run Date | Jan 08 '21 at 12:30 |
Run Duration | 185 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
64.9%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
56.2%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$129
685GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 350 396 358 370 367 MB/s
|
98.6%
Outstanding
|
|||
Toshiba Q300 240GB-$85
46GB free
Firmware: SAFM12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 121 118 143 143 144 MB/s
|
48.4%
Average
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
314GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 299 284 285 252 301 MB/s
|
95.7%
Outstanding
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ABA200 2TB
861GB free
Firmware: MZ4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 121 118 143 143 144 MB/s
|
58.2%
Above average
|
|||
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
587GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 65 63 65 64 MB/s
|
34.2%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
44.3%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 570x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 210x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 110x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 74x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 66x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 61x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $440 |