Besstar GD41

Performance Results

Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop 24%
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemBesstar GD41  (all builds)
MotherboardTo To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 07 '21 at 19:18
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Celeron N4120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Memory 36
1-Core 23.1
2-Core 44.6
23% 34.6 Pts
4-Core 62.6
8-Core 65.2
9% 63.9 Pts
64-Core 60.4
4% 60.4 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.75% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 2.4
2% 2.03 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 0.3
2% 1.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.75%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kodilx SSD 128GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 91 97 86 86 99 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.5% Very poor
Read 71.4
Write 96.5
Mixed 79.4
SusWrite 92.1
19% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 16
4K Mixed 7.1
27% 9.8 MB/s
DQ Read 25.2
DQ Write 96.1
DQ Mixed 35.8
35% 52.4 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston CBD24D4S7S8K1A-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
17.8% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 6.5
19% 6.67 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 3
8% 2.93 GB/s
Latency 222
18% 222 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GD41 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Besstar GD41

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $390Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback