Asrock Z370M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 141%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z370M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 07 '21 at 17:09
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$300
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Memory 92.8
1-Core 131
2-Core 263
93% 162 Pts
4-Core 519
8-Core 836
86% 677 Pts
64-Core 1,002
67% 1,002 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
MSI(1462 3908) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
151% Outstanding
Lighting 213
Reflection 208
Parallax 197
172% 206 fps
MRender 194
Gravity 149
Splatting 135
126% 159 fps
Poor: 134%
This bench: 151%
Great: 165%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B 500GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 315 333 145 141 155 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 488
Write 431
Mixed 311
SusWrite 246
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 61.7
4K Mixed 38.8
129% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 275
218% 303 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 116%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$138
20GB free
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 479
Write 432
Mixed 183
81% 364 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 29
91% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 139
122% 187 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 90%
WD Black 1.5TB (2010)
18GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 74 64 74 73 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
42% Average
Read 74.2
Write 76.2
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 71.7
54% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42%
Great: 85%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$100
665GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 119 107 122 122 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 139
Write 120
Mixed 115
SusWrite 119
91% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
211% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 84%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$55
466GB free
Firmware: PB4OC64G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 77 79 79 78 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 76.9
Write 76.7
Mixed 41
SusWrite 77.8
50% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 46%
WD My Passport 25E1 2TB
256GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 67 66 67 66 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 92.7
Write 72
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 66.2
92% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
164% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown CMW16GX4M2Z3200C16 04CD F4-2666C15-8GVR 029E CMW16GX4M2Z3200C16 04CD F4-2666C15-8GVR 32GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
87.3% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 26.8
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 38
SC Mixed 28.8
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z370M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,645 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock Z370M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $656
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $300Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $100G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback