Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	91.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 6,301 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	73.8% Very good	Memory 78.6 1-Core 90.8 2-Core 191 68% 120 Pts	4-Core 370 8-Core 715 64% 543 Pts	64-Core 1,471 91% 1,471 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 79%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 61 58 64 61 59 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	91.5% Outstanding	Read 491 Write 467 Mixed 327 SusWrite 85.8 76% 343 MB/s	4K Read 37.1 4K Write 84.8 4K Mixed 48.3 163% 56.7 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 332 256% 349 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 91.5% Great: 114%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1.5TB free Firmware: ABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 156 160 161 157 161 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	88% Excellent	Read 148 Write 168 Mixed 30.9 SusWrite 159 91% 126 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 15,285 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	53.7% Above average	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 19.3 MC Mixed 16.3 54% 18.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 17.5 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 83.1 48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 110%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Raft

SSD
SA2000M8250G 250GBKingstonBench 171%, 42,173 samples	9x
NE-512 512GBBench 177%, 5,933 samples	6x
NE-256 256GBBench 159%, 6,044 samples	6x

RAM
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	11x
Atermiter 4x8GBUnknownBench 94%, 483 samples	8x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 59%, 1,132 samples	7x

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $59

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16