HP Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80CB
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200207
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJan 07 '21 at 10:12
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-6310 APU R4 Graphics
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Memory 44.6
1-Core 34.2
2-Core 68.4
30% 49.1 Pts
4-Core 117
8-Core 118
16% 117 Pts
64-Core 118
7% 118 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4
HP(103C 80CB) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
2.53% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 3.5
3% 3.23 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.1
2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.53%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 480GB
304GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 222 94 96 94 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 420
Write 369
Mixed 318
SusWrite 157
71% 316 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 30.8
109% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 159
125% 172 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 CT51264BF160BJ.M8F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 6.5
18% 6.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.6
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 182
22% 182 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 7,802 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback