PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 29.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Intel B75 (all builds) |
Memory | 1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20181227 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 07 '21 at 00:36 |
Run Duration | 134 Seconds |
Run User | BRA-User |
Background CPU | 49% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3470S
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
57.2%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.79
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
15.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 12 18 12 42 5.4 MB/s
|
29.9%
Poor
|
|||
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154
85GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 60 59 58 63 62 MB/s
|
30.8%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 8GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
39.4%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 1,011x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 741x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 709x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 434x |
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 411x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 385x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $384 |