Asus 1000H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus 1000H  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK 1000H
Memory1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090721
Uptime6.3 Days
Run DateJan 06 '21 at 13:39
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N270
PBGA 437, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Memory 37.6
1-Core 6.9
2-Core 11.4
15% 18.6 Pts
4-Core 10
8-Core 10.6
1% 10.3 Pts
64-Core 11.2
1% 11.2 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9160310AS 160GB-$36
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0303
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 55 61 60 59 57 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 54.5
Write 59.3
Mixed 34.1
SusWrite 57.5
38% 51.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 38%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 32GB
22GB free, PID 5597
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 9.9 8.2 9 8.5 8.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
9.15% Terrible
Read 26.4
Write 11.3
Mixed 14.8
SusWrite 9
18% 15.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.8
101% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.15%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
7.93% Terrible
MC Read 2.9
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 2
7% 2.47 GB/s
SC Read 1.6
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 2.1
6% 2.03 GB/s
Latency 214
19% 214 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.93%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback