Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T8100-$78 2,639 User benchmarks, average bench 35% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	35% Below average	Memory 62.5 1-Core 26.1 2-Core 44 32% 44.2 Pts	4-Core 46.7 8-Core 48.8 6% 47.8 Pts	64-Core 48.1 3% 48.1 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia ION 1,623 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(A0A0 0802) 64MB Ram: 64MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	0.72% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 0.3 Parallax 0.4 1% 0.5 fps	MRender 1.3 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 1.1 1% 1.03 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.72% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3259GSXP 320GB-$50 3,175 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 266GB free (System drive) Firmware: GN001U SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 40 11 7.5 7.4 31 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	28.3% Poor	Read 76.5 Write 75.3 Mixed 43.5 SusWrite 21.7 40% 54.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.4 89% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NS-DI Kingston 99U5428-044.A00LF 6GB 4915, 4915 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	13.1% Very poor	MC Read 4.6 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 3.7 11% 3.97 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 3.9 10% 3.57 GB/s	Latency 120 33% 120 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo T6500IntelBench 34%, 3,335 samples	2x
Core2 Duo T7250Intel $97Bench 34%, 3,604 samples	1x
Core2 Duo T6400Intel $99Bench 34%, 4,995 samples	1x

GPU
IONNvidiaBench 1%, 1,623 samples	4x

SSD
TS128GSSD230S 128GBTranscendBench 83%, 2,263 samples	1x
M4 128GBCrucial $116Bench 60%, 34,516 samples	1x
Burst 120GBPatriotBench 66%, 15,567 samples	1x

RAM
78.A2GC9.AF0 2x2GBApacerBench 23%, 9 samples	2x
M471B5673EH1-CF8 M471B5673FH0-CF8 4GBSamsungBench 38%, 66 samples	1x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 8,481 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16