ADD TO PC
BUILD

Tarox Basic 5261BM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	47.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Tarox Basic 5261BM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK P8B75-M
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 720 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130218
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 05 '21 at 23:05
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.3% Very good	Memory 91 1-Core 98.7 2-Core 196 75% 129 Pts	4-Core 357 8-Core 359 48% 358 Pts	64-Core 374 23% 374 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Nvidia(10DE 13C2) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	47.8% Average	Lighting 57.9 Reflection 99.9 Parallax 61.2 47% 73 fps	MRender 69.6 Gravity 59.5 Splatting 53.7 49% 60.9 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 268GB free (System drive) Firmware: KC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 87 112 116 116 117 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	63.6% Good	Read 112 Write 110 Mixed 61.1 SusWrite 109 72% 98.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 135% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 88%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23 63,281 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 167GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 84 84 85 85 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Read 98.5 Write 98.6 Mixed 52.1 SusWrite 84.6 61% 83.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 54%
ASMT 2105 1TB 1,332 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 551GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 190 186 191 192 192 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	45.8% Average	Read 17 Write 17.7 Mixed 48.7 SusWrite 191 106% 68.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 38% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 79%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 1,303 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 931GB free, PID 2322 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 128 128 102 100 106 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	36.6% Below average	Read 50.5 Write 110 Mixed 55 SusWrite 115 121% 82.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.3 58% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBRL 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBRL Kingston 99U5471-037.A00LF 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	60.7% Good	MC Read 22.4 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 18.8 61% 21.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 18.8 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 65.8 61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback