Asus K53SV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemAsus K53SV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K53SV
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110926
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 05 '21 at 21:50
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$199
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
65.2% Good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 72.4
2-Core 143
62% 99.9 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 349
39% 301 Pts
64-Core 344
23% 344 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 66%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 640GB (2010)-$60
567GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 79 81 81 79 79 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 85.6
Write 81.8
Mixed 49.1
SusWrite 79.9
54% 74.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 48%
WD Elements 25A1 2TB
1TB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 23 23 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 28.1
Write 20.6
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 23.2
31% 23.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
47.6% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 14
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical K53SV Builds (Compare 1,363 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K53SV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $141
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $92SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback