Avita NS14A8

Performance Results

Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop 52%
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemAvita NS14A8  (all builds)
MotherboardAVITA 6H14DR5M80
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200624
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 04 '21 at 17:55
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
49.5% Average
Memory 72.3
1-Core 71.9
2-Core 118
55% 87.2 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 207
23% 177 Pts
64-Core 232
16% 232 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Device(1DC2 2209) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.20
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
4.9% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 6.9
5% 8.13 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 7.8
5% 7.33 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 4.9%
Great: 13%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Biwin SSD 512GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1022A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 76 6.1 59 29 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 493
Write 294
Mixed 157
SusWrite 41.2
54% 246 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 9.4
57% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 0.6
48% 115 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 259%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.7% Above average
MC Read 23
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 20.5
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 20.4
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 96.1
42% 96.1 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical NS14A8 Builds (Compare 155 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 57%
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Avita NS14A8

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $390Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback