Medion ERAZER P5373 I/C291

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Medion ERAZER P5373 I/C291 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION B150H4-EM
Memory	2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160727
Uptime	11.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 03 '21 at 18:41
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	85%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Memory 79.9 1-Core 76.5 2-Core 174 64% 110 Pts	4-Core 217 8-Core 312 33% 264 Pts	64-Core 337 21% 337 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% MSI(1462 3203) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.6% Poor	Lighting 40.1 Reflection 42.2 Parallax 36.5 33% 39.6 fps	MRender 34.9 Gravity 38.6 Splatting 0.2 18% 24.6 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GB 6,038 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXT2101Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 17 14 15 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	Read 356 Write 26.1 Mixed 47.2 SusWrite 16.3 24% 111 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 11.7 4K Mixed 9.8 45% 13 MB/s	DQ Read 180 DQ Write 11 DQ Mixed 21.3 34% 70.7 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 59%
Samsung MZ7LN256HCHP-00000 1TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 197GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 141 142 142 143 144 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 138 Write 125 Mixed 77 SusWrite 142 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 209% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 103%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109 43,695 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 931GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 104 105 103 105 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	Read 91.9 Write 94.3 Mixed 85.7 SusWrite 104 70% 93.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 126% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1x8GB 16,202 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.5% Below average	MC Read 11.8 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 11.6 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 9.3 22% 7.83 GB/s	Latency 80.8 50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ERAZER P5373 I/C291 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

System: Medion ERAZER P5373 I/C291

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	1x

SSD
MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 6,038 samples	1x

RAM
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 16,202 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $277

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16