Asus X510UAR

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.93% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	62.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus X510UAR (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X510UAR
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190419
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Jan 02 '21 at 16:17
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	16%
CPU Throttled	90%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8550U 184,356 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	79.4% Very good	Memory 77 1-Core 123 2-Core 244 81% 148 Pts	4-Core 446 8-Core 603 66% 525 Pts	64-Core 585 36% 585 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R) 420,154 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1D30) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9079 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.93% Terrible	Lighting 9.7 Reflection 7.3 Parallax 8.5 8% 8.5 fps	MRender 11.1 Gravity 9.8 Splatting 0.2 5% 7.03 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.93% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNK128GVN8 128GB 2,065 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: K8AS4102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 107 118 107 108 108 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	62.2% Good	Read 367 Write 135 Mixed 160 SusWrite 112 43% 194 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 86.3 4K Mixed 22.8 104% 42.7 MB/s	DQ Read 309 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 148 127% 193 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 74%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 787GB free Firmware: JU000J SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 128 131 132 132 130 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	75.7% Very good	Read 132 Write 122 Mixed 50.6 SusWrite 131 79% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 0.6 215% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2666 C18 2x8GB 1,187 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76.3% Very good	MC Read 29.8 MC Write 29.5 MC Mixed 22.1 78% 27.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 31.5 SC Mixed 24.5 70% 24.6 GB/s	Latency 86.3 46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X510UAR Builds (Compare 624 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X510UAR

CPU
Core i5-8250UIntelBench 53%, 234,942 samples	514x
Core i7-8550UIntelBench 53%, 184,356 samples	68x
Core i3-8130UIntelBench 48%, 25,471 samples	42x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	623x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	1x

SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	75x
THNSNK128GVN8 128GBToshibaBench 56%, 2,065 samples	69x
SD8SN8U128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 65%, 7,802 samples	21x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	201x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	107x
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 1x4GBHynixBench 32%, 32,443 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16