ECS MCP61M-M3

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	45.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	ECS MCP61M-M3 (all builds)
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100610
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 02 '21 at 16:16
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83 41,403 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	Memory 77.7 1-Core 52.2 2-Core 105 50% 78.3 Pts	4-Core 210 8-Core 209 28% 209 Pts	64-Core 210 13% 210 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399 68,699 User benchmarks, average bench 46% MSI(1462 3081) CLim: 977 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing below potential (51^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.7% Average	Lighting 58.8 Reflection 68.6 Parallax 79.1 48% 68.8 fps	MRender 58.6 Gravity 55.1 Splatting 41.5 41% 51.7 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: 541A SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 56 82 63 58 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	43.8% Average	Read 197 Write 90.5 Mixed 94 SusWrite 68.8 25% 113 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 57.2 4K Mixed 27.4 94% 34.5 MB/s	DQ Read 23.5 DQ Write 84.8 DQ Mixed 25.5 28% 44.6 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 73%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 72GB free Firmware: 1AJ1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 80 82 83 96 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	57% Above average	Read 114 Write 116 Mixed 62.9 SusWrite 83.8 69% 94.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 77%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 13,169 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 10GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 3.2 3.2 2.4 2.1 2.1 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 10.2 Write 3.7 Mixed 4.7 SusWrite 2.7 6% 5.32 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 0.4 34% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RM51264BA1339.16FR RM51264BA1339.16FR 8GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 667, 667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33% Below average	MC Read 14.6 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 12.7 33% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 7.3 19% 6.77 GB/s	Latency 84.8 47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MCP61M-M3 Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS MCP61M-M3

CPU
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples	18x
Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples	8x
Phenom II X4 840AMD $150Bench 47%, 5,147 samples	6x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	11x
GeForce 6150SE nForce 430NvidiaBench 0%, 4,836 samples	9x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	4x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
SSDNow V300 60GBKingston $76Bench 48%, 24,219 samples	2x
120G B 120GBSSDBench 54%, 43 samples	2x

RAM
99P5474-013.A00LF0 1x4GBKingstonBench 26%, 22 samples	6x
9905403-176.A00LF 2x2GBKingstonBench 40%, 57 samples	4x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 32%, 29,968 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16