Asus ZenBook UX434FQ_UX434FQ

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	98.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus ZenBook UX434FQ_UX434FQ (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK UX434FQ
Memory	2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200416
Uptime	4.4 Days
Run Date	Jan 02 '21 at 13:31
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	12%
CPU Throttled	76%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10210U 54,859 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	66.2% Good	Memory 70.9 1-Core 99.2 2-Core 226 72% 132 Pts	4-Core 362 8-Core 323 47% 343 Pts	64-Core 302 19% 302 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 11C2) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9030 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	5.02% Terrible	Lighting 4.8 Reflection 24 Parallax 6.6 4% 11.8 fps	MRender 8.3 Gravity 5.5 Splatting 11.4 7% 8.4 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.02% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GB 561 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 268GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXV7000Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 164 170 167 162 160 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	98.7% Outstanding	Read 930 Write 203 Mixed 265 SusWrite 164 85% 390 MB/s	4K Read 29.1 4K Write 65.8 4K Mixed 38 128% 44.3 MB/s	DQ Read 424 DQ Write 99.9 DQ Mixed 200 163% 241 MB/s
Poor: 92% ↑ This bench: 98.7% Great: 212%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K4E6E304EC-EGCG 2x4GB 8,402 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	67.5% Good	MC Read 26.5 MC Write 25.7 MC Mixed 22 71% 24.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 23.7 SC Mixed 21.6 53% 18.5 GB/s	Latency 99.3 40% 99.3 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ZenBook UX434FQ_UX434FQ Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Asus ZenBook UX434FQ_UX434FQ

CPU
Core i7-10510UIntelBench 56%, 51,080 samples	34x
Core i5-10210UIntelBench 53%, 54,859 samples	8x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 110,580 samples	29x
GeForce MX350NvidiaBench 15%, 723 samples	13x

SSD
MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GBSamsungBench 136%, 14,873 samples	15x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $74Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	8x
INTEL SSDPEKNW010T8 1TBNvmeBench 168%, 3,285 samples	5x

RAM
K4EBE304ED-EGCG 2x8GBSamsungBench 66%, 2,620 samples	30x
K4E6E304EC-EGCG 2x4GBSamsungBench 68%, 8,402 samples	8x
H9CCNNNCLGALAR-NVD 2x8GBHynixBench 66%, 10,159 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16