Asus PRIME H310M-E R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	48.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H310M-E R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190906
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jan 01 '21 at 10:36
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	91.4% Outstanding	Memory 94.6 1-Core 135 2-Core 266 92% 165 Pts	4-Core 508 8-Core 518 68% 513 Pts	64-Core 518 32% 518 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Gigabyte(1458 22F7) CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 2050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.12.1 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	48.8% Average	Lighting 59.5 Reflection 67.4 Parallax 89.7 48% 72.2 fps	MRender 68.2 Gravity 67.1 Splatting 50.2 49% 61.8 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61A3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 19 65 78 70 36 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Read 404 Write 279 Mixed 333 SusWrite 79.8 61% 274 MB/s	4K Read 39.7 4K Write 88.1 4K Mixed 37.4 155% 55.1 MB/s	DQ Read 248 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 195 171% 252 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 85%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$40 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 368GB free Firmware: 20.04F20 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 84 86 86 85 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	49.4% Average	Read 87 Write 74.3 Mixed 61 SusWrite 84.8 57% 76.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2666 C15 2x4GB 741 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	83.1% Excellent	MC Read 31.2 MC Write 32.3 MC Mixed 24.4 84% 29.3 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 30.9 SC Mixed 25.6 72% 25.1 GB/s	Latency 58.3 69% 58.3 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H310M-E R2.0 Builds (Compare 6,368 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-E R2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,632x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	999x
Core i7-9700FIntel $295Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	944x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	688x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	552x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	362x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	305x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	174x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	144x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	193x
PSD48G266681 2x8GBPatriotBench 79%, 6,425 samples	190x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	161x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $359

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16