O.e.m Intel H81

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	79.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	57.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	O.e.m Intel H81 (all builds)
Memory	3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190819
Uptime	1.6 Days
Run Date	Jan 01 '21 at 09:36
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4690-$52 73,695 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Memory 95.3 1-Core 100 2-Core 200 77% 132 Pts	4-Core 408 8-Core 408 55% 408 Pts	64-Core 405 25% 405 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 36FC) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	79.9% Very good	Lighting 98.1 Reflection 108 Parallax 97.8 80% 101 fps	MRender 94.9 Gravity 98.5 Splatting 98.2 80% 97.2 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB 36,832 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA17.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 59 60 126 44 62 MB/s Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	57.1% Above average	Read 218 Write 105 Mixed 154 SusWrite 80.2 31% 139 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 58.2 4K Mixed 33.9 116% 40 MB/s	DQ Read 144 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 134 109% 153 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 90%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 11GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 242 Write 222 Mixed 213 50% 226 MB/s	4K Read 31.5 4K Write 75.7 4K Mixed 49.9 152% 52.4 MB/s	DQ Read 199 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 192 144% 192 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Seagate ST33000651NS 3TB 6,381 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 291GB free Firmware: G009 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 109 112 112 108 109 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	66.8% Good	Read 124 Write 119 Mixed 61.9 SusWrite 109 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB 8,627 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	63.8% Good	MC Read 22.4 MC Write 23.4 MC Mixed 20 63% 21.9 GB/s	SC Read 16.9 SC Write 19.3 SC Mixed 20.8 54% 19 GB/s	Latency 56.2 71% 56.2 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Intel H81 Builds (Compare 793 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: O.e.m Intel H81

CPU
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	119x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	87x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	63x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	168x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	87x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	53x

SSD
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	24x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	23x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	21x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	73x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	39x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	32x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $114

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16