Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '21 at 00:28
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
54% Above average
Memory 74.6
1-Core 49.2
2-Core 99.1
47% 74.3 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 195
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 194
12% 194 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3766) 2GB
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 1972 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Lighting 34.9
Reflection 37.8
Parallax 36.1
28% 36.3 fps
MRender 42.9
Gravity 36.8
Splatting 25.9
28% 35.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 295 301 307 289 273 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 303
Write 352
Mixed 265
SusWrite 284
68% 301 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 53.2
4K Mixed 31.4
104% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 30.7
DQ Write 85.9
DQ Mixed 41.9
37% 52.8 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 113%
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC128MAG 128GB
97GB free
Firmware: 0006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 128 114 139 139 138 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 288
Write 138
Mixed 180
SusWrite 129
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 6.1
63% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 87.4
91% 152 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 62%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
309GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 173 175 176 175 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 167
Mixed 82
SusWrite 172
110% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 102%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.1% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 11.4
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 8.5
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 91.3
44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback