Asus H170-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics177% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H170-PRO  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '20 at 01:43
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 70%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 84.7
2-Core 199
69% 122 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 592
58% 478 Pts
64-Core 626
39% 626 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
177% Outstanding
Lighting 255
Reflection 235
Parallax 264
208% 252 fps
MRender 283
Gravity 210
Splatting 160
172% 218 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 177%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT30Q.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 113
Write 1,819
Mixed 95.1
156% 676 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 0.4
63% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 546
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 687
449% 529 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 305%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
400GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 117 120 120 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 116
Write 111
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 119
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
421GB free
Firmware: 20.01H20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 28 30 30 31 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 117
Write 116
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 31.9
62% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HDS721075CLA332 750GB-$190
355GB free
Firmware: JP3OA3GH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 121 124 126 125 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 127
Write 129
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 124
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 72%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.1% Good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 19.8
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 18.5
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170-PRO Builds (Compare 2,347 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus H170-PRO - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $462
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback