Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2367M 2,143 User benchmarks, average bench 42% Socket BGA1023, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	38.2% Below average	Memory 61.3 1-Core 27.5 2-Core 47.3 32% 45.4 Pts	4-Core 90.1 8-Core 91 12% 90.6 Pts	64-Core 89.7 6% 89.7 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 0009) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	1.36% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.63 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 2.1 1% 1.57 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.36% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Msata 128GB SSD 128GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0123A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 24 74 77 49 37 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.2% Below average	Read 208 Write 25.6 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 71.3 18% 82 MB/s	4K Read 8.4 4K Write 32.3 4K Mixed 17.8 53% 19.5 MB/s	DQ Read 190 DQ Write 159 DQ Mixed 1.5 48% 117 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 10GB 21,027 User benchmarks, average bench 31% null MHz 2048, 8192 MB Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	29.3% Poor	MC Read 10.3 MC Write 10.3 MC Mixed 10.6 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 8 21% 7.3 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	18x

SSD
THNSNB128GMCJ 128GBToshibaBench 16%, 582 samples	9x
SUV500MS480G 480GBKingstonBench 73%, 658 samples	2x
MZMTD128HAFV-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 2,350 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16