| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 59.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H61M-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140721 |
| Uptime | 1 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 30 '20 at 04:59 |
| Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
| Run User | ZAF-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
80.3%
Excellent
|
76% 129 Pts
|
51% 384 Pts
|
24% 386 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
Nvidia(10DE 139D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
59.3%
Above average
|
63% 76 fps
|
53% 64.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$20
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 19 8.6 56 77 81 MB/s
|
38.4%
Below average
|
50% 67.3 MB/s
|
175% 1.23 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Expansion 2TB
245GB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 28 29 29 29 MB/s
|
17.5%
Very poor
|
21% 28 MB/s
|
219% 1.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
59.1%
Above average
|
58% 20.2 GB/s
|
50% 17.5 GB/s
|
69% 57.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-K Builds (Compare 2,322 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H61M-K - $140
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 332x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 265x |
| Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 188x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 441x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 146x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 112x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $227 |