Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 144% UFO	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 121% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	190% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	79.3% Very good	Memory 80.8 1-Core 132 2-Core 201 80% 138 Pts	4-Core 419 8-Core 616 65% 517 Pts	64-Core 636 39% 636 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 90%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,275 158,856 User benchmarks, average bench 210% Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	190% Outstanding	Lighting 275 Reflection 250 Parallax 280 224% 268 fps	MRender 311 Gravity 236 Splatting 174 189% 240 fps
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 190% Great: 230%
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% MSI(1462 3160) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.5% Above average	Lighting 63.7 Reflection 70.4 Parallax 62.4 52% 65.5 fps	MRender 69.2 Gravity 63.5 Splatting 55.5 51% 62.7 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adat SU800NS38 512GB 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: P1025A Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 485 Write 446 Mixed 411 100% 447 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 91.8 4K Mixed 41.3 142% 53.3 MB/s	DQ Read 194 DQ Write 283 DQ Mixed 236 179% 238 MB/s

Hitachi HDS721010CLA330 1TB 8,831 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 25GB free Firmware: JP4OA3MA SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 54 54 56 61 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	37% Below average	Read 73 Write 75.5 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 55.8 45% 61 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 76%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 358GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 115 115 114 115 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	Read 134 Write 116 Mixed 82.2 SusWrite 114 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.9 183% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 112%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 119 121 118 121 120 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	71.9% Very good	Read 132 Write 114 Mixed 70.4 SusWrite 118 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK8GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK8GX4M2B3200C16 24GB 90 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67.6% Good	MC Read 23.8 MC Write 26.2 MC Mixed 22 69% 24 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 25.2 SC Mixed 19.9 59% 20.5 GB/s	Latency 79.2 50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 111%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 69%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 58%

Gunboat

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	80x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	68x
BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD 2x8GBCrucialBench 79%, 22,335 samples	40x

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $450

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16