| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 36.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Fujitsu ESPRIMO P910 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D3162-A1 |
| Memory | 3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | Χρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180316 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 29 '20 at 20:59 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | GRC-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
73.2%
Very good
|
71% 124 Pts
|
49% 368 Pts
|
22% 364 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gainward(10B0 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1767 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.8%
Poor
|
31% 39.1 fps
|
28% 34.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SSD 240GB 240GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 230 7.5 48 3.1 34 MB/s
|
36.3%
Below average
|
72% 323 MB/s
|
40% 11.2 MB/s
|
15% 37.6 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
85GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 42 48 48 48 49 MB/s
|
25.9%
Poor
|
32% 43.4 MB/s
|
127% 0.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
50.4%
Above average
|
50% 17.4 GB/s
|
43% 15.2 GB/s
|
53% 75.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical ESPRIMO P910 Builds (Compare 538 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P910
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 285x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 129x |
| Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 40x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 81x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 61x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 40x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |