Asrock H170A-X1/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics152% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock H170A-X1/3.1  (all builds)
Memory20.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '20 at 14:04
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$379
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Memory 80.8
1-Core 125
2-Core 263
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 711
73% 575 Pts
64-Core 702
47% 702 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
MSI(1462 3901) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
152% Outstanding
Lighting 227
Reflection 143
Parallax 143
183% 171 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 143
Splatting 128
115% 138 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 152%
Great: 164%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 241 239 233 238 231 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 403
Write 349
Mixed 375
SusWrite 251
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 97.5
4K Mixed 53.4
172% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 354
268% 360 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 102%
Great: 123%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$288
1.5TB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 438 464 465 467 474 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 436
Mixed 384
SusWrite 447
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 80.5
4K Mixed 48.1
155% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 358
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 110%
Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$79
44GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 332 267 231 198 173 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 455
Mixed 448
SusWrite 259
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 96.2
4K Mixed 48.8
162% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 356
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 102%
Great: 129%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$99
395GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 63 74 75 66 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
47% Average
Read 92.5
Write 98.9
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 70.8
57% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
198% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 47%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown CMV8GX4M1A2133C15 Kingston KHX2133C14D4/4G 0215 CMV8GX4M1A2133C15 Kingston KHX2133C14D4/4G 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 19.2
64% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 23.2
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H170A-X1/3.1 Builds (Compare 178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock H170A-X1/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $717
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $320Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $95SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback