Performance Results


Gaming 147% UFO	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 125% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	148% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	92.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B51
Motherboard	MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201010
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 29 '20 at 01:28
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	43%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$155 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	100% Outstanding	Memory 92.9 1-Core 148 2-Core 295 98% 179 Pts	4-Core 580 8-Core 822 88% 701 Pts	64-Core 822 51% 822 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% PNY(196E 136E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing below potential (46^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	148% Outstanding	Lighting 214 Reflection 206 Parallax 215 174% 212 fps	MRender 202 Gravity 154 Splatting 134 130% 163 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 148% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 297 251 270 310 261 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	92.6% Outstanding	Read 350 Write 337 Mixed 314 SusWrite 282 72% 321 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 85.5 4K Mixed 54.5 141% 52.3 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 331 253% 343 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 92.6% Great: 128%
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB 85,321 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 83GB free Firmware: UJ400400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 135 127 123 124 116 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	45.7% Average	Read 363 Write 309 Mixed 272 SusWrite 155 62% 275 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 36.6 4K Mixed 10.6 58% 21.1 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 98.9 DQ Mixed 18.9 39% 78.7 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 55%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 250GB-$44 9,759 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 230GB free Firmware: GM2OA5CA SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 87 88 88 88 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	50.6% Above average	Read 88.5 Write 84.8 Mixed 48.9 SusWrite 87.7 57% 77.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLT8G4D30BET4K.C8FD 2x8GB 2,605 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	91.9% Outstanding	MC Read 37.3 MC Write 36.2 MC Mixed 27 96% 33.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 30.4 SC Mixed 24.3 69% 24.3 GB/s	Latency 62.3 64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 106%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 91%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 84%

Aircraft carrier

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	1,618x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,541x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	1,314x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	893x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	763x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	699x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	1,078x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	989x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	695x

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $981

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16