Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardINTEL X99
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 28 '20 at 18:33
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 97.9
2-Core 194
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 636
60% 500 Pts
64-Core 893
55% 893 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45% Average
Lighting 56.1
Reflection 60.4
Parallax 77.2
46% 64.6 fps
MRender 60.2
Gravity 59.3
Splatting 44.5
44% 54.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
526GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 414 416 416 415 414 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 431
Write 411
Mixed 401
SusWrite 416
94% 415 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 80
4K Mixed 40.9
139% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 295
239% 339 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 102%
Great: 125%
Kingchuxing 32GB 32GB
10GB free
Firmware: 7A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 21 13 14 14 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.1% Poor
Read 252
Write 145
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 25.5
25% 114 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 24.7
4K Mixed 0.7
46% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 47.7
DQ Write 55.1
DQ Mixed 0.7
15% 34.5 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 47%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
340GB free
Firmware: A750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 127 138 138 137 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 163
Write 171
Mixed 37.9
SusWrite 135
92% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 107%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
7GB free
Firmware: 1E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 44 44 44 44 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
23.4% Poor
Read 36.9
Write 37.1
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 44
27% 36.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 33%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22
145GB free
Firmware: 1D58
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 74 75 74 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 76.2
Write 73.1
Mixed 49.8
SusWrite 74.1
50% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BRBP1G48G16C2400 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.4% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 19
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17.7
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,506 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback