Asrock X99X Killer

Performance Results


Gaming 144% UFO	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 128% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	185% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock X99X Killer (all builds)
Memory	23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180406
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Dec 28 '20 at 05:10
Run Duration	275 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70 34,039 User benchmarks, average bench 80% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	77.9% Very good	Memory 88.8 1-Core 98.8 2-Core 193 74% 127 Pts	4-Core 362 8-Core 613 59% 487 Pts	64-Core 777 48% 777 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,306 158,856 User benchmarks, average bench 210% EVGA(3842 3987) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	185% Outstanding	Lighting 253 Reflection 295 Parallax 377 206% 308 fps	MRender 345 Gravity 256 Splatting 184 206% 262 fps
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 185% Great: 230%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 131GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 651 354 336 390 410 408 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	206% Outstanding	Read 2,276 Write 2,023 Mixed 1,369 SusWrite 425 339% 1,523 MB/s	4K Read 53 4K Write 93.5 4K Mixed 66.6 215% 71 MB/s	DQ Read 672 DQ Write 322 DQ Mixed 496 368% 497 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 206% Great: 302%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 62GB free Firmware: DXM06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 220 220 222 212 217 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	77.3% Very good	Read 464 Write 375 Mixed 285 SusWrite 221 75% 336 MB/s	4K Read 29.3 4K Write 70.1 4K Mixed 30.3 120% 43.2 MB/s	DQ Read 272 DQ Write 114 DQ Mixed 111 104% 166 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 116%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 11GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 4,487 Write 4,126 Mixed 4,430 971% 4,348 MB/s	4K Read 452 4K Write 183 4K Mixed 235 1,083% 290 MB/s	DQ Read 818 DQ Write 394 DQ Mixed 539 418% 584 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
Samsung XP941 PCIe M.2 256GB 1,434 User benchmarks, average bench 133% 8GB free Firmware: UXM6501Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 354 Write 252 Mixed 274 65% 293 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 63.9 4K Mixed 36.5 126% 43.6 MB/s	DQ Read 368 DQ Write 222 DQ Mixed 199 174% 263 MB/s
Poor: 86% Great: 160%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 513GB free Firmware: JB0OA3J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 151 150 146 147 146 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	90.9% Outstanding	Read 169 Write 130 Mixed 31.8 SusWrite 147 86% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 90.9% Great: 75%
Seagate ST32000641AS 2TB-$174 8,506 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 18 18 18 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Read 37.1 Write 39.4 Mixed 29 SusWrite 18.5 23% 31 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 73%
Seagate Portable 4TB 3,750 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2.5TB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	15.4% Very poor	Read 34.2 Write 36.7 Mixed 34 SusWrite 18.2 23% 30.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.6 167% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 3000 C15 8x4GB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	90.5% Outstanding	MC Read 36 MC Write 29.4 MC Mixed 39 99% 34.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 18.9 SC Mixed 16.8 47% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 68.7 58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 90.5% Great: 131%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99X Killer Builds (Compare 265 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 84%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 75%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99X Killer - $350

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	147x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	42x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	25x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	24x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	20x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	19x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	18x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	12x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x

RAM
BL8G36C16U4BL.M8FE1 2x8GBUnknownBench 96%, 5,257 samples	12x
Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 87%, 2,702 samples	9x
DDR4 2800 2OZ 4x8GBUnknownBench 86%, 829 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $923

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16