Asus Crosshair IV Extreme

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics89.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive30% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Extreme  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '20 at 04:44
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$129
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 88.9
1-Core 66.1
2-Core 127
59% 94 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 394
38% 312 Pts
64-Core 392
24% 392 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Zotac(19DA 1396) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1607 MHz, MLim: 1805 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Lighting 114
Reflection 124
Parallax 119
93% 119 fps
MRender 105
Gravity 108
Splatting 93
82% 102 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 82 75 74 50 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
30% Below average
Read 332
Write 297
Mixed 98.4
SusWrite 67.1
44% 199 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 15.4
4K Mixed 10
39% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 18
DQ Write 15.9
DQ Mixed 9.8
9% 14.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 30%
Great: 55%
Gamer V TA1D0120A 120GB
5GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 165
Write 226
Mixed 203
45% 198 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 57
4K Mixed 22.7
98% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 36.3
DQ Write 75.7
DQ Mixed 36.8
34% 49.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 87%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
3GB free
Firmware: 180.
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 75.3
Write 74.3
Mixed 49.6
49% 66.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 84%
Toshiba DT01ABA200V 2TB
61GB free
Firmware: ZMO4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 83 105 104 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
61% Good
Read 119
Write 107
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 93.9
70% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
121% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 61%
Great: 87%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
73GB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 73 74 75 76 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
48% Average
Read 92.2
Write 98.9
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 74.7
62% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
321GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 81 74 50 45 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 84.8
Write 85.7
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 69.1
55% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MT451U6MFR8Y-AB1 MT451U6MFR8Y-CC0 MT451U6MFR8Y-AB1 MT451U6MFR8Y-CC0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.4% Average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 18.2
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 13.8
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair IV Extreme Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Extreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $778
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback