HP EliteBook 8770w

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	52.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP EliteBook 8770w (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 176C
Memory	15.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20190419
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 27 '20 at 22:39
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	40%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3820QM-$275 3,135 User benchmarks, average bench 66% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	69.5% Good	Memory 79.5 1-Core 95.7 2-Core 179 68% 118 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 465 49% 394 Pts	64-Core 472 29% 472 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K3000M 2,310 User benchmarks, average bench 8% HP(103C 176C) 2GB CLim: 653 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 426.32 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	7.58% Terrible	Lighting 8.2 Reflection 11.4 Parallax 11.3 7% 10.3 fps	MRender 12.8 Gravity 11.3 Splatting 10.5 9% 11.5 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.58% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SQF-S25M8-128G-S8E 128GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: S8FM06A7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 189 185 187 127 31 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	Read 423 Write 192 Mixed 202 SusWrite 151 54% 242 MB/s	4K Read 14.3 4K Write 36 4K Mixed 16.1 61% 22.1 MB/s	DQ Read 138 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 19.3 55% 115 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 62%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 136GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 65 66 65 66 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	50.6% Above average	Read 110 Write 88 Mixed 65 SusWrite 66.1 61% 82.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 79%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB 50,772 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 256GB free Firmware: 2BE10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 16 17 15 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Read 20.5 Write 44.5 Mixed 11.3 SusWrite 16.7 17% 23.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.2 38% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 70%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB 5,644 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 41 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	30.3% Below average	Read 40.3 Write 39.5 Mixed 36 SusWrite 40.2 53% 39 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 1.1 213% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 96%
WDC WD10 JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 509GB free, PID 0711 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	20.7% Poor	Read 39.3 Write 39.8 Mixed 29.5 SusWrite 39.9 50% 37.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 M471B1G73EB0-YK0 M471B1G73EB0-YK0 24GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	47.3% Average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 16.3 MC Mixed 14.3 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 15.9 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 81.5 49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 8770w Builds (Compare 562 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8770w

CPU
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples	99x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	92x
Core i7-3740QMIntel $220Bench 64%, 14,369 samples	82x

GPU
Quadro K3000MNvidiaBench 8%, 2,310 samples	296x
Quadro K4000MNvidiaBench 12%, 631 samples	95x
Radeon HD 7700MAMDBench 7%, 733 samples	25x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	34x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	14x
MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GBSamsungBench 84%, 5,922 samples	13x

RAM
8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 48%, 14,177 samples	20x
EBJ81UG8BBU0-GN-F 2x8GBElpidaBench 51%, 682 samples	11x
HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB 4x8GBHynixBench 53%, 361 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16