Fujitsu CELSIUS H730

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS H730  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB274
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170525
Uptime10.2 Days
Run DateDec 27 '20 at 22:28
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4800MQ-$150
Onboard, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 176
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 409
44% 350 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 17AC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.52% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 8
Parallax 7.1
3% 6.33 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 5.3
4% 5.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.52%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 256GB-$225
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HTFAN102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 233 219 200 194 188 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.9% Above average
Read 242
Write 129
Mixed 221
SusWrite 210
45% 201 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 28
84% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 193
140% 182 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 106%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
477GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 104 76 88 107 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 5.8
Write 17.2
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 87.6
23% 32 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.2
111% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 70%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 123GB
77GB free, PID 5595
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 2.1 9.1 8.2 0.3 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 47.3
Write 35.7
Mixed 29
SusWrite 6.6
36% 29.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
54% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.5% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 13.9
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 17.2
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS H730 Builds (Compare 139 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS H730

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $400
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback