Performance Results


Gaming 171% UFO	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 168% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	197% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	320% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock X470 Gaming-ITX/ac (all builds)
Memory	22.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200709
Uptime	4.7 Days
Run Date	Dec 27 '20 at 17:37
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	87.9% Excellent	Memory 78.5 1-Core 150 2-Core 292 93% 173 Pts	4-Core 522 8-Core 884 85% 703 Pts	64-Core 1,279 79% 1,279 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 87.9% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$625 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% Asus(1043 87B0); ASUS TUF GAMING GeForce RTX 3080 CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	197% Outstanding	Lighting 290 Reflection 255 Parallax 291 237% 279 fps	MRender 319 Gravity 232 Splatting 172 190% 241 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 197% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 151GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1649 1380 1263 1172 1084 710 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	320% Outstanding	Read 2,636 Write 2,442 Mixed 1,875 SusWrite 1,210 457% 2,041 MB/s	4K Read 64.3 4K Write 177 4K Mixed 92.5 310% 111 MB/s	DQ Read 1068 DQ Write 900 DQ Mixed 964 728% 977 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 320% Great: 372%
SABRENT 250GB 481 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 87GB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 337 331 333 334 333 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	83.4% Excellent	Read 364 Write 346 Mixed 341 SusWrite 336 78% 346 MB/s	4K Read 37.9 4K Write 40 4K Mixed 38.2 128% 38.7 MB/s	DQ Read 195 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 191 144% 192 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 886GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 92 97 90 85 82 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	29.6% Poor	Read 14 Write 81.4 Mixed 30.8 SusWrite 88.8 39% 53.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x16GB 981 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	84.5% Excellent	MC Read 34.9 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 34.3 87% 30.5 GB/s	SC Read 23.1 SC Write 21.8 SC Mixed 31.3 73% 25.4 GB/s	Latency 83.3 48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 111%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 96%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 88%

Aircraft carrier

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	6x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	5x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	7x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	6x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	4x

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $763

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16