ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP 500-419

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	6.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	96.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP 500-419 (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2B17
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140904
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 27 '20 at 05:37
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-770K (2014 D.Ka) 1,664 User benchmarks, average bench 44% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	42.3% Average	Memory 52.3 1-Core 61.2 2-Core 91.6 42% 68.4 Pts	4-Core 188 8-Core 187 25% 188 Pts	64-Core 186 12% 186 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 240 58,337 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1B0A 90D3) 2GB CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	6.23% Terrible	Lighting 7.8 Reflection 9.3 Parallax 10.6 6% 9.23 fps	MRender 7.7 Gravity 8 Splatting 6.5 6% 7.4 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.23% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 248 231 224 221 210 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	96.7% Outstanding	Read 488 Write 435 Mixed 424 SusWrite 237 89% 396 MB/s	4K Read 40.7 4K Write 76.6 4K Mixed 50.2 167% 55.8 MB/s	DQ Read 260 DQ Write 220 DQ Mixed 245 182% 242 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 96.7% Great: 128%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 488GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 99 99 99 98 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	79.7% Very good	Read 179 Write 173 Mixed 89.2 SusWrite 98.1 99% 135 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 234% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 109%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB 13,353 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 621GB free Firmware: 0304 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 106 110 109 110 109 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	Read 90.7 Write 111 Mixed 66 SusWrite 107 69% 93.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 0.6 156% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 65%
Seagate GoFlex Desk 2TB 1,143 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 206GB free, PID 50a5 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 76 73 74 74 74 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	Read 82 Write 87.1 Mixed 28.8 SusWrite 74 90% 68 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 33% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 1x8GB 9,029 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24.3% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 7.8 24% 8.37 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 7.8 21% 7.37 GB/s	Latency 153 26% 153 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical 500-419 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: HP 500-419

CPU
FX-770K (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 1,664 samples	1x

GPU
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples	1x

RAM
ACR256X64D3U1333C9 CT51264BA1339.C16F CT51264BA1339.M16F Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 18GBKingstonBench 23%, 3 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback