Asus P6X58D-E

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	40% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus P6X58D-E (all builds)
Memory	8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120806
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 27 '20 at 00:22
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5670 9,061 User benchmarks, average bench 73% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	83.9% Excellent	Memory 96.3 1-Core 96.4 2-Core 193 76% 129 Pts	4-Core 386 8-Core 622 62% 504 Pts	64-Core 721 45% 721 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Gigabyte(1458 22D0) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1400 MHz, MLim: 2200 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.11.2 Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	40% Average	Lighting 45.5 Reflection 65.5 Parallax 71.4 37% 60.8 fps	MRender 69.5 Gravity 53.1 Splatting 48.7 46% 57.1 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40 77,177 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 104GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 211 211 212 207 209 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	67.1% Good	Read 356 Write 213 Mixed 252 SusWrite 210 58% 258 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 42.5 4K Mixed 30.8 100% 32.7 MB/s	DQ Read 226 DQ Write 170 DQ Mixed 145 123% 180 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 123%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159 43,620 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 262GB free Firmware: GM4OA57A SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 83 84 83 85 85 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	47.5% Average	Read 82 Write 84 Mixed 44.7 SusWrite 83.3 54% 73.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x2GB 38,297 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 6 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	52.7% Above average	MC Read 20 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 21.2 53% 18.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 8.1 SC Mixed 12.2 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 52.9 76% 52.9 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P6X58D-E Builds (Compare 1,351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P6X58D-E

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	496x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	198x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	145x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	74x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	74x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	68x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	47x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	40x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	231x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	221x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	132x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $289

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16