HP EliteBook 2730p

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook 2730p  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 30EB
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081215
Uptime681.3 Days
Run DateDec 26 '20 at 16:12
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo U9300
Intel(R) Genuine processor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Memory 61.2
1-Core 17.4
2-Core 27.3
27% 35.3 Pts
4-Core 24.5
8-Core 27.6
3% 26 Pts
64-Core 31.4
2% 31.4 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
HP(103C 30EB) 797MB
Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2869
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.34% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.6
Parallax 0.6
0% 0.53 fps
MRender 0.5
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.6
0% 0.43 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.34%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK1216GS 120GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4C
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 18.9
Mixed 13.7
12% 16.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
29% 0.27 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 3.6
12% 4.1 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 2.6
8% 2.67 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 2730p Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 2730p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback