Gigabyte GA-H77M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H77M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120822
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateDec 26 '20 at 05:41
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 100
2-Core 189
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 468
50% 398 Pts
64-Core 451
28% 451 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 3670) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Lighting 65.3
Reflection 69.7
Parallax 68.2
53% 67.7 fps
MRender 66.6
Gravity 63
Splatting 54.3
49% 61.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 5.2 19 73 104 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 377
Write 227
Mixed 147
SusWrite 67.9
45% 205 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 19.8
4K Mixed 17.9
60% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 19.9
DQ Write 25
DQ Mixed 21.5
16% 22.1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 53%
Seagate ST3360320AS 360GB-$79
89GB free
Firmware: 3.CHN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 70 73 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 71
Write 34.5
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 71.1
41% 55.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 44%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
500GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 64 63 59 65 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 54.5
Write 39.3
Mixed 42
SusWrite 62.7
37% 49.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 59%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
666GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 64 64 59 65 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 97.8
Write 73.2
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 62.8
54% 73.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
181% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0708
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 129 130 129 130 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 100
Write 131
Mixed 98.5
SusWrite 126
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.9
219% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 67%
ASMT 2115 320GB
94GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 19 18 17 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 24.7
Write 26.7
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 17.9
28% 20.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
55% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL9-9-9 D3-1333 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15.8
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 15.1
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H77M-D3H Builds (Compare 1,271 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H77M-D3H - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $424
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback