| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 53.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asrock 960GM/U3S3 FX (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20131002 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 25 '20 at 16:41 |
| Run Duration | 157 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
68.9%
Good
|
64% 104 Pts
|
42% 346 Pts
|
27% 436 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.3
|
53.9%
Above average
|
57% 74.8 fps
|
48% 60.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
56% 253 MB/s
|
123% 40.5 MB/s
|
36% 49.9 MB/s
| |
|
Hitachi HDT725025VLA380 250GB-$132
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V5DOA7EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 46 50 48 52 52 MB/s
|
31.4%
Below average
|
38% 51.5 MB/s
|
153% 1.13 MB/s
| |
|
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45
133GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 96 100 98 106 100 MB/s
|
60%
Above average
|
61% 83.8 MB/s
|
132% 1.13 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung SP1614C 160GB-$98
44GB free
Firmware: SW100-30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 56 56 56 56 56 MB/s
|
32.1%
Below average
|
38% 52.2 MB/s
|
153% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM 333 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
49.2%
Average
|
50% 17.5 GB/s
|
32% 11.1 GB/s
|
60% 67.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 960GM/U3S3 FX Builds (Compare 93 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 960GM/U3S3 FX - $131
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 40x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 7x |
| FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 7x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 12x |
| GTX 650-TiNvidia $152Bench 14%, 36,698 samples | 4x |
| R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 105% - Outstanding | Total price: $237 |