Gigabyte GA-M1M3XBP-00

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	56.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-M1M3XBP-00 (all builds)
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140314
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 20 '17 at 16:51
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	34%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-5557M APU 571 User benchmarks, average bench 43% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	44.3% Average	Memory 71.5 1-Core 32.1 2-Core 59.7 38% 54.4 Pts	4-Core 103 8-Core 103 14% 103 Pts	64-Core 102 6% 102 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 51%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 140GB free Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1309 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 351 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 63 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 11 (F1) Unknown 99 99 803112610	69.9% Good	Read 495 Write 384 Mixed 412 96% 430 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 32.5 4K Mixed 19.2 76% 24.7 MB/s	DQ Read 86.1 DQ Write 75.6 DQ Mixed 39.7 41% 67.1 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 124%
Crucial MX200 mSATA 250GB 974 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1321 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 373 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 12 (AE) Unknown 100 100 44 (B4) Unknown 0 0 2575 (B7) Unknown 100 100 194 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 65 48 223339413539 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 2109475066 (F7) Unknown 100 100 66241635 (F8) Unknown 100 100 75645842	56.7% Above average	Read 481 Write 244 Mixed 305 76% 344 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 28.5 4K Mixed 16.8 62% 20.7 MB/s	DQ Read 87.3 DQ Write 71.3 DQ Mixed 30.3 36% 63 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 107%
WD 5000AAD External 500GB 282 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 73GB free, PID 1003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Read 34.2 Write 35 Mixed 34.4 45% 34.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 1.09 4K Mixed 0.16 45% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 1,963 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.4% Poor	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 10.2 28% 9.87 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 8 19% 6.63 GB/s	Latency 98 41% 98 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-M1M3XBP-00

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)