Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 107% UFO	Workstation 74% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	449% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	55.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201204
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 25 '20 at 00:50
Run Duration	196 Seconds
Run User	SVN-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$416 33,026 User benchmarks, average bench 100% AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 88.5 1-Core 168 2-Core 333 105% 197 Pts	4-Core 621 8-Core 1,277 111% 949 Pts	64-Core 2,816 174% 2,816 Pts
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 110%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.9% Above average	Lighting 64.7 Reflection 68.5 Parallax 62.1 53% 65.1 fps	MRender 66.6 Gravity 67.5 Splatting 61.9 53% 65.3 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TB 44,185 User benchmarks, average bench 430% 841GB free (System drive) Firmware: 611100WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 2459 2501 2480 2518 2528 2522 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	449% Outstanding	Read 3,556 Write 2,550 Mixed 2604 SusWrite 2,501 628% 2,803 MB/s	4K Read 74.8 4K Write 177 4K Mixed 93.9 328% 115 MB/s	DQ Read 1,414 DQ Write 978 DQ Mixed 1,147 869% 1,179 MB/s
Poor: 264% ↑ This bench: 449% Great: 573%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 3.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 187 185 189 188 188 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 193 Write 124 Mixed 108 SusWrite 186 112% 153 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1 206% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 101%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 876GB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 135 142 144 140 143 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Read 124 Write 126 Mixed 25.9 SusWrite 141 75% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-32GVK 2x31.5GB 1,890 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	124% Outstanding	MC Read 61.4 MC Write 39.4 MC Mixed 38.7 133% 46.5 GB/s	SC Read 30.4 SC Write 23.8 SC Mixed 40 90% 31.4 GB/s	Latency 69.1 58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 142%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	569x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	514x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	402x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	339x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	271x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	141x

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $940

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16