Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N3710 12,685 User benchmarks, average bench 25% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	27.6% Poor	Memory 39.2 1-Core 18.5 2-Core 49.9 23% 35.9 Pts	4-Core 91.9 8-Core 100 13% 96.2 Pts	64-Core 102 6% 102 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 1D5D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5107 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.39% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 0.7 Parallax 3.4 1% 1.9 fps	MRender 1.5 Gravity 2.6 Splatting 1.7 2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.39% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 199GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1Z40102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 273 241 241 265 308 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	Read 340 Write 302 Mixed 299 SusWrite 266 68% 302 MB/s	4K Read 14.5 4K Write 32.6 4K Mixed 12.4 55% 19.8 MB/s	DQ Read 214 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 47.6 76% 147 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8KTF1G64HDZ-1G6A1 1x8GB 446 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (75^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19.7% Very poor	MC Read 7.2 MC Write 8.3 MC Mixed 6.7 21% 7.4 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 2.9 9% 3.27 GB/s	Latency 206 19% 206 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 21%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3060IntelBench 18%, 20,242 samples	22x
Celeron N3050IntelBench 19%, 14,457 samples	19x
Pentium N3710IntelBench 25%, 12,685 samples	13x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	70x

SSD
SD8SBAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 58%, 3,654 samples	13x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
Premier SP550 120GBAdata $45Bench 76%, 22,057 samples	2x

RAM
HMT451S6CFR6A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 20%, 5,898 samples	22x
8KTF51264HDZ-1G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 24%, 1,041 samples	13x
8KTF51264HDZ-1G9P1 1x4GBMicronBench 16%, 114 samples	11x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16