Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	48% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 631 1,364 User benchmarks, average bench 46% FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	39.7% Below average	Memory 55.9 1-Core 38.9 2-Core 80.8 37% 58.5 Pts	4-Core 137 8-Core 141 18% 139 Pts	64-Core 139 9% 139 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Asus(1043 04C2) CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.9.1 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	48% Average	Lighting 61.1 Reflection 60.2 Parallax 80 50% 67.1 fps	MRender 60.3 Gravity 62.5 Splatting 44.9 45% 55.9 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB 16,974 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 3GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE45 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 241 Write 169 Mixed 124 39% 178 MB/s	4K Read 14.7 4K Write 15.6 4K Mixed 11.2 45% 13.8 MB/s	DQ Read 106 DQ Write 58.9 DQ Mixed 41.4 42% 68.9 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23 32,491 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 38GB free Firmware: JC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 75 76 67 75 74 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Read 116 Write 114 Mixed 71 SusWrite 73.6 69% 93.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1600, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	31.8% Below average	MC Read 12.7 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 10.6 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 8.3 19% 6.7 GB/s	Latency 140 28% 140 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

RAM
F3-12800CL9-2GBRL 4GBUnknownBench 39%, 39 samples	3x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	2x
JM1333KLN-4G 1x4GBTranscendBench 26%, 2,367 samples	1x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16