Acer Predator PT515-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics98.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive217% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 77% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator PT515-51  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Ghibli_CFS
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200304
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 24 '20 at 13:21
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 77%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Memory 89.3
1-Core 124
2-Core 246
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 794
78% 640 Pts
64-Core 1,019
63% 1,019 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080 (Mobile Max-Q)
Acer(1025 132D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3135 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 142
Parallax 131
100% 132 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 112
Splatting 108
96% 120 fps
Poor: 73%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1861 757 615 614 618 614 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
217% Outstanding
Read 1238
Write 1,430
Mixed 939
SusWrite 846
251% 1,113 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 69.1
213% 73.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,190
DQ Write 998
DQ Mixed 1,070
808% 1,086 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 217%
Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
466GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1424 1099 629 631 630 628 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,172
Write 1,532
Mixed 940
SusWrite 840
253% 1,121 MB/s
4K Read 50.4
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 72.2
232% 80.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,272
DQ Write 1,102
DQ Mixed 1,179
886% 1,184 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 223%
Great: 340%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
MC Read 32
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 26.7
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 36.1
SC Mixed 26.7
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PT515-51 Builds (Compare 677 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PT515-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback