Asus TUF Gaming FX505GM_FX505GM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics47.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505GM_FX505GM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505GM
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200525
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateDec 23 '20 at 09:06
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 91.5
1-Core 125
2-Core 240
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 459
8-Core 717
72% 588 Pts
64-Core 862
53% 862 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1B9E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.8% Average
Lighting 56.6
Reflection 68.3
Parallax 60.6
46% 61.8 fps
MRender 64.9
Gravity 60.5
Splatting 62.3
51% 62.6 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 52%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1B9E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.35% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 7.6
6% 7.87 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 10.8
8% 9.33 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.35%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,175
Write 1,206
Mixed 1,085
258% 1,156 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 62.3
210% 76.3 MB/s
DQ Read 834
DQ Write 599
DQ Mixed 677
516% 703 MB/s
Poor: 86% Great: 187%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35
7GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 83 86 78 81 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 68.2
Write 63.6
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 83.2
48% 65.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
89% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 50%
Seagate Expansion+ 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 35.2
Write 14.4
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 14.1
15% 20.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
68% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 859B CT8G4SFS8266.M8FD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
MC Read 32
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 23
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 25
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505GM_FX505GM Builds (Compare 535 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GM_FX505GM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback